Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 5,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
In a 1941 case called Associated Press v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
., v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
The International Court of Justice, in its judgment of Congo v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:33 pm
This court overruled that holding in State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Past week: US v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:25 am
” Crownover v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
In drug cases, though, Congress and the courts change all the rules: in most states you can’t even argue the drug maker was negligent, you can only argue the drug maker didn’t warn you that they were negligent. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:38 am
In it’s decision notice the GSCC stated that Mr Place’s criticism of delay in CAFCASS reporting on a private forum was “legitimate” and that “the facts supported the stance taken by [Mr Place] that CAFCASS had put a dishonest spin on the scale of the problems it faced. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
Freeman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
B. v. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
