Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 4981 - 5000 of 6,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
  It is certainly evidence of a crisis among the ruling elites in China; a crisis that parallels that in the United States about the legitimacy and character of the founding ideology of the state and its political order. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Senator Michael Bennett (D-Colo.) introduced a bill that would establish a federal watchdog to regulate “Big Tech”—the largest technology companies in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2025, 1:40 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The plaintiffs leaned on this clause, pointing to a 2023 Ninth Circuit decision (California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:41 pm by San Antonio Lawyer
This is your right to remain silent as guaranteed to you by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Holly
United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 530-31 (2004). [7] See Entergy Corp.l v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm by Doug Kendall
In dissent in a 1999 case called City of Chicago v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm by Ilya Somin
Harmon essentially has no choice but to keep renewing their respective leases every few years. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]