Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 5001 - 5020 of 7,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
It’s fist-bump (v.); fist bump (n.) / gray (not grey) / and a 3-m hmmm. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis President Obama ordered his aides on Thursday "to get to work immediately with Congress" to develop "a forceful response" to the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm by John Culhane
The problem with that is the Supreme Court’s own holding, in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am by SHG
The distinction between the Supreme Court’s judgment and precedent is often conflated due to Cooper v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:22 am by Alfred Brophy
 Tanner Kroeger and I are working on a paper on Harvard College v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Surely you are not laying yourselves open to the accusation (which no polite Kat would make) of being so pusillanimous that you can't even tell the ACG whether you propose to intervene in this case? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Part V (Sections 76 - 78) of the Irish Patents Act 1992 (as amended) permits the use of inventions "for the service of the State". [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Marin
Wall Street 2 is a sequel  both because its title includes “2” and it continues the NYC plotline of the original (though the writing has worsened).The quibbling over spinoff v. sequel reminds me of one of those textbook trust and estate cases where the lawyer thoughtlessly inserts the words “now living” and inadvertently cuts a future-born child out of the will. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:38 pm by admin
Si le consommateur fournit la notification écrite de son intention pour contester la dette, alors l’agent de recouvrement doit arrêter toutes activités de recouvrement jusqu’à ce qu’il obtienne et fournisse au consommateur la preuve que la dette à été vérifiée. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am by RFPattorney
   Resist the urge to write like a lawyer – In Smith v. [read post]