Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 5001 - 5020 of 6,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Neil Cahn
She arrived in the United States in 1981, at the age of twenty-one. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
  I would never do that.Adam, you wrote The United States is the only country to take the position that some police misconduct must automatically result in the suppression of physical evidence. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:10 am
Since then, approximately fifty million abortions have been committed in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Terry Hart
The good news is that, for the most part, the legal framework both in the United States and internationally recognizes these principles. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by jn92
In this case, the source is a set of books published by the United States government that contains the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
From the aspect of Freedom of Choice verses do I want to live in a Nanny State? [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jefferson Powell To turn now to the reviews, Jeff Powell’s post offers several supportive observations:  he suggests that the general need for balance in the law reinforces my proposal’s legitimacy, he points to the majority opinion on gun rights in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
I have long had some sympathy with the idea of a robust Second Amendment individual right that is nevertheless not incorporated against the States: in essence, treating the Second as a "strong federalism" provision , an individually justiciable restraint on Congress and the federal administrative state analogous to the Commerce Clause limitations recognized in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
They should not expect their religion to become the law of the United States. [read post]