Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 48,974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2022, 12:00 am
Multisure Corporation (Pty) Ltd v KGA Life Limited and Others : Eastern Cape High Court Gqeberha case no. 2780/2021 [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:27 am
The plaintiff states in Louisiana v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
In Carolina Conduit Systems Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:42 am
” They further noted that a pharmaceutical company could mitigate the compliance risks if, among other things, “[t]he availability of the test at no cost is not used to promote the product or leverage access to a health care provider. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:48 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 2826 (Pat) (22 Oct 2021)In Disclosure - Anan Kasei Co. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Note that subsections (a), (b) and (c) provide for specific exceptions to the general rule. [4] See Spanski Enterprises, Inc v IMB+ Records Inc, 2013 ONSC 5382 at para 6; Allarco Entertainment 2008 Inc v Staples Canada ULC, 2021 ABQB 340 at para 19; Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
There are some costs to this, but on balance, I believe this consistency, along with the enhanced control environment, brings greater benefits and efficiencies to these disclosures. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
In Litel Explorations, LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:51 pm
Gabriel appeals.At which point he and his firm get sanctioned by the Court of Appeal for filing a frivolous appeal.He's actually fairly lucky; the sanctions to the other side were only $12,798.50, which is fairly low for the costs of defending even a silly appeal. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:03 am
” (Grewal v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am
While there are clearly cost and delay implications related to the implementation of the Cannabis Trailer Bill, there may remain silver linings to these significant changes. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:42 am
The post Sandy Hook v [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 5:50 am
Finding that the commission had established Duke’s rate and adjudicated depreciation rates for the cost of decommissioning its plant assets, including coal-ash costs, in its 2004 rate order, the Court concluded that the utility regulation commission exceeded its statutory authority by granting Duke’s request to re-adjudicate its coal-ash costs that were already governed by the commission’s 2004 rate order. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In Fono v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
This writer has never heard of such levies even being considered, and any such levies could deter innovation in this space due to the public's lack of desire for its implementation due to costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
This writer has never heard of such levies even being considered, and any such levies could deter innovation in this space due to the public's lack of desire for its implementation due to costs. [read post]
