Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements could again be trusted. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And in one old case, Beauharnais v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Done, “a former pediatrician from Wayne State University. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
The answer to that question, some may argue, is found in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" Xu further stated that he felt sick due to the accusations and experienced tremendous nervousness and anxiety. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:37 am
Herlihy-Paoli stated that she felt severe pain after the Depuy Pinnacle hip was implanted in 2009. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:46 am
This scenario has been played out last week in a decision of the Gujarat High Court in Vodafone Essar Gujarat Limited v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:41 am
In a other work titled Who Speaks for the Negro, Warren most directly states his regret for his earlier work Briar Patch, stating he did not realize its racist and seperationist overtones. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Notably, the case history states that Roy received a lung cancer diagnosis in 2011. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
Mauritz v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:20 am
In Perot v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:35 am
In the recent decision of Humphrey v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:13 am
In her June 14, 2012 decision in Matter of A.H. v C.B., Queens County Family Court Judge Edwina G. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Von Kuersteiner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:54 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]