Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 5021 - 5040 of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am by John Jascob
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements could again be trusted. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
Done, “a former pediatrician from Wayne State University. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Nate Nieman
The answer to that question, some may argue, is found in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:37 am by Clay Hodges
Herlihy-Paoli stated that she felt severe pain after the Depuy Pinnacle hip was implanted in 2009. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:46 am
This scenario has been played out last week in a decision of the Gujarat High Court in Vodafone Essar Gujarat Limited v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:41 am by Alfred Brophy
In a other work titled Who Speaks for the Negro, Warren most directly states his regret for his earlier work Briar Patch, stating he did not realize its racist and seperationist overtones. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:13 am by Neil Cahn
In her June 14, 2012 decision in Matter of A.H. v C.B., Queens County Family Court Judge Edwina G. [read post]