Search for: "Fields v. United States" Results 5021 - 5040 of 5,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
If the state wants to stick it's nose into the lives of families (as it undoubtedly must do sometimes), it must stick that nose in only as far as is necessary and proportionate, and only where authorised by law (usually but not always it is the Children Act 1989 which gives that authorisation in this field). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Innovators and their investors have long been vital to a flourishing innovation economy in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The funds obtained through the enforcement in the relevant EU Member State shall therefore invariably be paid to the relevant State treasury in Germany. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The prohibition on unlawful insider trading levels the playing field and protects the integrity of financial markets. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
United States, essentially ruling that the US Department of Commerce could not concurrently apply countervailing duties (CVDs) and antidumping (AD) duties to imports from China, as long as China continues to be designated a "non-market economy" under the US antidumping law. [read post]