Search for: "Browning v. State" Results 5041 - 5060 of 8,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2023, there was a hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Davidoff and others v Brown QB-2020-002760. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Tatel, a liberal, and two conservatives, Senior Judge Silberman and Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown.) [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
A ruling extending that reasoning beyond capital cases “could be the Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Copyright is like theft and, on the authority of a dictum of Lord Browne-Wilkinson's in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669, stolen property is subject to a constructive trust in favour of the rightful owner. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
But in real time, things were rather different.For example, Herbert Wechsler is now remembered as a conservative because he famously and obtusely wrote in the 1959 Harvard Law Review that he regretted his inability to justify Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Conor McEvily
At the Huffington Post, Jelena Hasbrouck suggests that if Perry v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am by Alyssa Rosen
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm by Mike
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong dismissed the federal claims and remanded the others to state court. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & [*2]Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]). [read post]