Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
” Gray v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Thirty-one states prevent people on parole or probation from casting ballots.Four states permanently bar ex-inmates from voting and do not allow restoration of that right, while eight others disenfranchise only people who have committed particularly egregious kinds of crimes.Sunday’s court decision striking down new barriers erected to limit the number of Florida’s previously disenfranchised population from voting is admirable, but much more needs to be done to ensure… [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
AF v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:06 am
For example, in Brentlinger Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 3:34 pm
As stated earlier, the Court agrees that these interests may be compelling in the abstract. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
UCC v Purchase Money Mortgage. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:09 pm
UCC v Purchase Money Mortgage. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
This decision will be welcome to all who are interested in protecting GI’s. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
One of Malka's Flair photographsA few days ago this blog reported on an interesting decision of the Swedish Supreme Court that held that unauthorized 'appropriation' of a substantial part of a photograph for use in a painting did not amount to copyright infringement, as the meaning of the defendant's work was different from the original work.A few days ago, also a French court (Versailles Court of Appeal) had the opportunity to decide a case (Malka… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:15 pm
Interesting student note. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:12 am
In October, the Alaska Court of Appeals in Lineker v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
"The case is Zherka v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
United States Department of Agriculture, to consider whether rational basis review can apply to compelled disclosures even if they serve interests other than preventing deception. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm
Harvey, 254 Wis.2d 442; State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:46 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
Mr Justice Arnold agreed, but also stated that the restriction was justified. [read post]
