Search for: "Stephens v. State" Results 5061 - 5080 of 6,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
By the evening, Rose stated that Mikayla “felt like she was on fire,” although she did not have a thermometer to measure her temperature due to the move. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am by SHG
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:02 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Stephen Durbin and Associates and considered it a violation of the Solicitors Act, finding it a contingency fee arrangement under a different name. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Secretary of State agreed, at least in the sort of ‘exceptional’ situation set out by him. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is, of course, true, that the courts of this State enjoy only limited authority to disturb the terms of a separation agreement (compare Goldman v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Zohar Case Zohar v LaRock, 185 AD3d 987 [2d Dept 2020], was an appeal from a Short Form Order of Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]