Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 7,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
United States 20-579Issues: (1) Whether courts may defer to Sentencing Guidelines commentary without first determining that the underlying guideline is genuinely ambiguous; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
United States The woman who claimed to be the victim of a brutal gang-rape portrayed in a now discredited Rolling Stone article will not testify in the defamation lawsuit facing the magazine. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:28 am
More on Porter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
Again, the strong reliance on those requirements is a bold move; the argument on this point closely resembles the argument that the United States presented in Mayo to no avail. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:18 am
” Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
The United States basically says, people. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:46 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 7/9/09Cite: McKenna v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Judge Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court in Manhattan, a former member of the National Commission on Forensic Science, said the weakest pattern analysis fields rely more on examiner intuition than science. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:18 pm
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Apple v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
” The specific question before the Court is: Whether the court of appeals erred when it rejected the United States’ assertion of the state-secrets privilege based on the court’s own assessment of potential harms to the national security, and required discovery to proceed further under 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) against former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractors on matters concerning alleged clandestine CIA activities.U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
In Cline – answering questions of state law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court – the Oklahoma Supreme Court had nothing but good things to say about off-label use.Cline was somewhat different than Abbottin its facts. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
“We make the point that the substantive case of age discrimination has never been heard and will affect thousands of priests, for many years to come … It is a matter of natural justice that the issue is heard in full and not swept away on a technicality. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:20 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:15 pm
See Daniel Milligan, et al., v. [read post]
