Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5081 - 5100 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am by Daniel Jin
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
SPECIAL THANKS We appreciate the assistance of Emmanuelle Naulais at Brown Rudnick, Paris Office with the following discussion on French, law, regulation and practice. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost suggests that, although the Court is “unlikely to be unanimous” if and when it reviews a challenge to state bans on same-sex marriage, “the gay rights ruling that now seems only a matter of time may well strike future generations just as Brown [v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
     Several of you have asked for information about the status of the Technology Patents LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm by Lawrence Solum
In his dissent, Marshall argues that the Milliken decision represents a “giant step backwards,” away from the desegregative and egalitarian orientation of Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am by Kiera Flynn
Analysis of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
Ch. 1952), aff’d, 91 A.2d 137 (Del. 1952) (which eventually became part of Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed:  “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept… [read post]