Search for: "Case v. People" Results 5081 - 5100 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 10:44 am
We have recently learned of a case in Connecticut, targeting University of Connecticut students, Arista v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But it is likely to undercount more recent developments, such as the rapid proliferation of deadly homemade weapons known as “ghost guns,” federal officials said…” National Firearms Commerce and Trafficking Assessment (NFCTA): Firearms Trafficking Investigations – Volume Three – Every day, more than 100 people are killed by gun violence across the United States, and many_more are wounded Director’s Foreword Part I – Introduction and… [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:32 pm by lennyesq
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case in which a leaked draft revealed that the court is poised to overrule Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:25 pm by corynne mcsherry
  Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceInnovationRelated Cases: Oracle v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who… [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the meantime, a Southern District judge has refused to dismiss a sexual orientation discrimination case under Title VII.The case is Philpott v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:48 am by Eric Goldman
This case involves a Twitter thread discussing the plaintiff’s alleged misconduct as a lawyer. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
 About the only people who benefit are the plaintiffs' attorneys, since it's a Section 1983 case and they get their fees paid if they win. [read post]