Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 51,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
In Exide Technologies v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
About the only people who benefit are the plaintiffs' attorneys, since it's a Section 1983 case and they get their fees paid if they win. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am
(Emphasis in original) (para. 76) (Justice Sharma reviews the freedom of expression jurisprudence extensively and distinguishes two cases, Walker v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:55 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
They employed FUD tactics before (during the district court trial and after Oracle appealed), misleading some people to believe that anyone using an API to write apps for a platform would have to worry, which was never the issue. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
(People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
But the district court (correctly) viewed this case as a close one, and one that related to an important workplace issue that might affect lots of people even though it was not a class action. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
The main example was the Byrne v Deane case when a letter was stuck to a noticeboard belonging to a golf club and officeholders at the golf club were sued as publishers because they knew about the letter being up, they had the power to remove it and they did not. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:37 pm
McIntyre v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:49 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:03 am
Chief Justice Earl Warren said that this case was the most important case during his tenure on the Court. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
For example, in the classic 1922 case of Pennsylvania Coal v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 pm
The court held that plaintiffs seeking class certification in a securities fraud case may not invoke the Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
Howell, a pro se case (Mr. [read post]
