Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
In other words, if I own the trademark for Brand X on water bottles in the United States and someone in China starts calling their water bottles "Brand X," there is no law to stop that company from selling Brand X water bottles in China unless I registered "Brand X" in China or Brand X for water bottles is a well-known mark. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:23 am
Point made (I hope). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:26 pm
That does the trick 99 percent of the time. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:09 pm
The informational blackmail problem is famously thorny, and I don’t think we need to solve it here, because I think that “if you want my vote and if you want to borrow money that I will have to help pay back, you need to promise to do X” is rather far from “if you want my silence about your crime or your affair, you need to promise to do X” and rather closer to the other examples I gave above, even when the… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
” Keith Lee named his site after it, so I’ll just quote him: Shoshin (??) [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
Prior to notifying the non-party of the order and where urgency does not preclude it, the applicant should ascertain whether the non-party will require a copy of any materials referred to in clause 13 of the Model Order. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:44 pm
I've not been able to find a transcript. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:44 pm
I've not been able to find a transcript. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
” Sex discrimination, says the DOE, includes sexual violence. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
"I clobbered a deponent once by doing X"/"We got a stinging verdict against Y corporation"/"Let me tell you how I beat up the Iron Sheik in Pontiac, Michigan," etc. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:04 am
Size does matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:29 pm
The IRS does not necessarily agree that all behaviors considered to be “addictions” qualify as a disease. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
” So, with the top experts in the field saying the days of “image everything” should be over, why does it still happen? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:27 am
For the avoidance of doubt paragraph 1(i) and (ii) is complied with if the Respondent uses the system known as Cleanfeed and does not require the Respondent to adopt DPI based blocking utilising detailed analysis. 3. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:16 am
I’m fresh out of jokes about sex with children. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm
Breivik’s “Manifesto” entry on the purchases also makes it sound like it was one export and ineligible for the $100 exemption: 10 x 30 round magazines – .223 cal at 34 USD per mag. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:34 am
This holding does conflict with Solis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:01 pm
Now the bag does not show whether or not the maker of bags has a license to use the copyrighted Miffy. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
The term an appeal does not restrict it to only one appeal in the High Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
In the present case the patent proprietor, whose patent had been revoked by the Opposition Division (OD), thought that the A 123(2) objection could be overcome by pointing out that a feature that had been omitted was devoid of meaning.The claims under consideration, which are directed at a process for producing an aldehyde, are quite lengthy, so I will not reproduce them. [read post]
