Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 7,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
But one can also look to even more direct precedent, such as the 1984 decision in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
USA v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
After all, as mayor, Emanuel has had plenty of other contenders for the title of “third rail of politics,” such as closing police stations to address budget shortfalls. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Shortly after enactment of the JOBS Act, the SEC posted guidance addressing expected questions related to Title V and Title VI. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
By Kathryn Hines and Manuel Gomez This year, visitors to the Metropolitan Museum of Art were able to view Rembrandt’s Portrait of the Artist (ca. 1665), on loan from the Kenwood House in North London and in the United States for the very first time. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
We have since had the one Eddie saw close up made into a nice ottoman on which we rest Our royal feet from time to time. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
He explained the house had a shared wireless network connecting both computers to the Internet, as well as its own internal file-sharing system enabling a user of one computer to access data and files on the other. . . . [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:30 am
" Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
Butler v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
This was significant, since it was common ground that the handbag was found at the couple’s house the day after Kamila disappeared. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:41 am
The rise in outside spending in 2008 back to 2004 levels came after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wisconsin Right to Life v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
A predecessor to section 41(3) was upheld by the High Court on the grounds that the Oireachtas was entitled to conclude that significant resources would unfairly distort the political marketplace in favour of larger parties, well-established interest groups and major candidates with deep pockets, and against the interests of smaller parties or interest groups and minor candidates lacking in similar resources (Colgan v IRTC [2000] 2 IR 490, [1999] 1 ILRM 22, [1998] IEHC 117 (20 July 1998)),… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:35 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Again this was for the sole purpose to demonstrate to the jury that Petitioner was in close proximity to the crime scene. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am
The “very fact” that the priest was required by Canon Law to reside in the parochial house close to his church was “rather like the employee making use of the employer’s tools of trade”. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
Euro-Pro Operating LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
The thrust of the discussion in the House was related to the differences between the existing Public Interest Immunity procedure and the proposed Closed Material Procedure under the Bill, and what relationship the two should have. [read post]
