Search for: "State v James"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 9,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
As the court noted recently in Riley v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm
Cal.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:04 pm
" Vail v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
Summary of Order of Disbarment September 12, 2012Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
Summary of Order of Disbarment September 12, 2012Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am
Briefly: Adam Winkler provides a history of gun rights at The Atlantic, concluding that Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:24 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
SFL v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm
The topics veer from James Madison to the Irish potato famine to 19th-century anti-Catholic sentiment to Montana’s 1972 state constitutional convention. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
