Search for: "In re Black"
Results 5121 - 5140
of 15,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 3:38 am
If you’re a private sector employer, you can generally fire an at-will employee for his or her political beliefs or expression. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 4:20 am
Now we’re getting closer to something objectively definable, although more refinement is needed to nail it down. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:07 am
Protective hesitation is when leaders don’t provide clear, consistent feedback to women and ethnically diverse staff because they’re worried about the recipients’ response or how they themselves could be perceived. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds In re G.G. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
They’re always giving out awards. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:22 am
And then the case falls into the black hole of delay. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 2:08 am
There’s something to be said about identifying and creating a CX leadership role—would it be easier if it were a black and white, perfectly defined role? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm
” In re Marriage of Wycoff, 266 Ill. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm
Nine times out of ten, they’re going to tell you that it just happened. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 am
And you think you’re the enlightened ones. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:50 am
(You can read more about it HERE if you’re so inclined.) [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:02 am
With the typical review process, most employees have clarity on their performance just one or two days per year – if they’re lucky. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
Diverse companies don’t just outperform their competitors; they’re also more attractive to jobseekers, and they have lower levels of turnover. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:08 am
Can Black women show up with their natural hairstyles and be considered ‘professional? [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Whether you’re a charts and graphs kinda person or not, these can often be very persuasive devices to visualize a problem that the mind dismisses. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
And regardless of how Oliver fares with the damage question down in Columbus, they're right. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
We can debate whether we’re serious about this principle, but it sounds good. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:08 am
There was an interesting development over the weekend in the NAFTA re-negotiations. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
Go out and you’re fair game. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
Why was a mid-range sentence appropriate at the first sentencing, but an above-range, statutory maximum sentence appropriate at re-sentencing based on the assault? [read post]