Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 5121 - 5140 of 8,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am by Barry Sookman
The cases summarized in the slides below canvass developments in a number of countries and include cases from Canada, United States, UK, Ireland, Australia, and Israel. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 am by Greg Mersol
Culinart, Inc., Case No. 12 Civ. 293 (JMF), the employer operated dining facilities at schools, corporations, and elsewhere across the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004) (citing Advanced Display Sys., Inc. v.Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272, 1282 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
United States, we got as close to unanimity as the week allowed. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:41 am by Gene Quinn
On May 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Medtronic v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:17 am by Thomas Kaufman
This morning, in a 5-3 decision (Sotomayor recused herself), the United States Supreme Court issued a pro-arbitration decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:42 am by David Kemp
Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, Inc., United States Supreme Court (6/20/13)Communications Law, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Non-profit CorporationsThe U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court wrote that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:32 am by Carla N. Dorsi
Calling that test “subjective and unpredictable,” the Court instead relied on the six factors identified by the United States Department of Labor in Fact Sheet # 71. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Tejinder Singh
  The Act requires states to “accept and use” a specific federal form for voter registration; that form asks, among other things, whether the would-be voter is a citizen of the United States and over the age of eighteen. [read post]