Search for: "Branch v. Mays" Results 5141 - 5160 of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:41 pm
The executive may bemoan the court's directions compelling it to discharge its obligation of law enforcement. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:03 pm by Michael Lowe
That may or may not work; for more on synthetic marijuana and how it can get you arrested, read our earlier post, “Synthetic Drugs Law: Will New Texas Law Succeed in Outlawing Spice, K2, and Other Synthetic Highs? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Delegation may be expedient, or even necessary, but it also has a cost. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm by Whitney Hodges and Lauren Chang
Commits the executive branch to working with the Legislature to identify statutory changes that can help expedite rebuilding while enhancing wildfire resilience and safety. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm by Lydia Estep
This rule is further explained in the Court’s decision in Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by John Coyle
It passed two resolutions—one in May 2016 and one in September 2016—challenging the power of the executive branch to proceed with the transaction and expressly rejecting the pledge of CITGO assets in the 2020 Notes. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 4:15 am
Rightly so, it is a branch of the Jewish raceviii. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm by David Gallacher and Bryce Chadwick
While the Executive Order imposed deadlines arriving in May 2019, history tells us it seems unlikely that any definitive solutions will be implemented by that time. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
The unlikelihood of such a policy as a legislative measure is evident from the contrary intention of the recently-enacted Racial Discrimination Act, and the judicial branch of government must take full cognizance of such factors. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]