Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5141 - 5160 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am by Michael Scutt
  It does not cover family members or friends (unless they are within the two allowed categories). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:31 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Using the data that does exist from studies related to drugs impact on the fetus, the FDA has established the following drug-rating safety system. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:45 am by Jordan Furlong
” “Hi, my name is Eric Jones — like you, I’m a graduate of X Law School and I also practice commercial law, although I’m based in Oregon. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  We’ve all seen any number of cases where the defendant pleads guilty, with the prosecutor recommending a sentence of X years, then the judge imposes a sentence of X+Y years; the defendant appeals, only to be told that a recommendation is just that. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:30 am by Robert Tanha
(1) Parts VII, VIII, IX, X and XI of the Act do not apply to a person employed, (a) as a duly qualified practitioner of, (i) architecture, (ii) law, (iii) professional engineering, (iv) public accounting, (v) surveying, or (vi) veterinary science; (b) as a duly registered practitioner of, (i) chiropody, (ii) chiropractic, (iii) dentistry, (iv) massage therapy, (v) medicine, (vi) optometry, (vii) pharmacy, (viii) physiotherapy, or (ix) psychology; (c) as a duly… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Making people take their computers out of their bags is not–that’s an X-ray machine, for goodness’ sake. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:49 am by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
This case, decided by the Illinois Supreme Court, will most certainly resolve some of the conflicting opinions in the lower courts.Edward X. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
They additionally asserted that the cap violates various provisions of the Florida Constitution: (1) the guarantee of separation of powers in Article II, § 3 and Article V, § 1; (2) the right to trial by jury under Article I, § 22; (3) the right of access to the courts under Article I, § 21; (4) the right to equal protection under Article I, § 2; and (5) the prohibition against a taking of property without just compensation under Article… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:16 am by Scott A. McKeown
Thus, a threshold determination for any defendant becomes: How does Court/Judge X view requests for patent reexamination? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
Not only is that false, but what does it say about how the Bar views the profession? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
First of all, how often does one have the pleasure of representing a company that exceeded some standard it was required to meet? [read post]