Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5141 - 5160 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 10:23 pm by Sheryl Allenson
In EEOC v United Airlines, Inc, the appeals court overruled its earlier precedent, after determining that the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am by INFORRM
The decision of the ECtHR in MGN v United Kingdom, which held that the AJA scheme was incompatible with article 10 of the Convention, concerned the balancing of the rights guaranteed by article 10 with article 6 rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Matt Danzer
Judge Anna Brown begins with a recitation of the facts, briefly summarized here: Latif and the other plaintiffs, all citizens of the United States, were prevented from boarding flights over U.S. airspace since 2009. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:47 am
One session was on international human rights law and its potential use in cases in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  The FactsJane Doe entered the United States unaccompanied, without legal documentation, in early September. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
  I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am by Andy Taylor
Some of the complexity arises because of a 2000 case from the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with grandparent visitation. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
As the world’s first binding treaty to explicitly protect environmental defenders, the Escazu Agreement was a turning point – although, notably, the United States and many other countries are not signatories. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
In practice this usually means that state regulation cannot favor in-state over out-of-state firms.[9] Second, neutral state regulations cannot unduly burden interstate commerce. [read post]