Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 7,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 2:21 pm
In Hnataik v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
This litigation has been fueled by a 1999 Supreme Court decision (Olmstead v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
No, there’s no proof of a gun found at that house on 310 North 24th Street. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
Evans v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
As the Whytes were crossing a street close to a neighbor's house, Ms. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:44 am
Ferrer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Here are some of the orders and pleadings from the Eaton v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
The principal cases setting forth the standard of whether stock is a security are United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
The "home rule" doctrine in New York construing this cryptic phrase so closely mimics the centralizing "substantial effects" doctrine under the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Deegan, 251 N.Y. 467 (1929) to settle on a doctrine essentially similar to Wickard v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As I thought about the question of whether we should put more poor people into owner-occupied houses, or instead move more non-poor people out of owner-occupied houses, it suddenly struck me that we might be looking at another example of the "leveling up or leveling down" question.That question was most famously raised in the Supreme Court's 1971 Palmer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
This view of law as propounded by author Graham Virgo in his celebrated book The Principles of the Law of Restitution has been accepted by a later decision of the House of Lords (now the UK Supreme Court) in Sempra Metals Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:54 am
Last September, the criminal case of Illnois v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 pm
Recently, in Souza v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
UT(LC): Legal Costs In Re: 36 Culpepper Close [2012] UKUT 102 (LC), the LVT had found for the landlord on the substantive issues, but held that it was not entitled to recover the legal costs under the terms of the lease as it did not use external solicitors, but had in-house lawyers. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
UT(LC): Legal Costs In Re: 36 Culpepper Close [2012] UKUT 102 (LC), the LVT had found for the landlord on the substantive issues, but held that it was not entitled to recover the legal costs under the terms of the lease as it did not use external solicitors, but had in-house lawyers. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
(SEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
(SEC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
