Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 4,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am by Christine Corcos
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
So long as the South remained a one-party region and the black vote was effectively suppressed, the principled incentive to use either district-based or proportional schemes in other states was diminished. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“Kansas’s arguments ignore the reality of license suspension practices in the United States, and the dangers of suspicionless stops to drivers of color, particularly black drivers. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  [6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Franchise Tax Bd., 105 AD3d at 205; see United States v Doe, 429 F3d 450, 453 [3d Cir 2005]; F.D.I.C. v Ogden Corp., 202 F3d 454, 461 [1st Cir 2000]). [read post]