Search for: "Day v. United Securities Corporation" Results 501 - 520 of 1,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Cassandra Labbees
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) requires that a Summary of Material Modification (SMM) is provided within 60 days of a “material reduction” in covered services or benefits provided under a group health plan. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Cassandra Labbees
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), requires that a Summary of Material Modification (SMM) is provided within 60 days of a “material reduction” in covered services or benefits provided under a group health plan. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then referenced the City's Cyber Command's Deputy Chief Information Security Officer explaining that disclosing "all New York City employees' email addresses would relinquish control of the City's information technology assets and jeopardize the security of those assets and of City infrastructure" by "mak[ing] it substantially easier for threat actors to successfully attack City . . . employees" in… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then referenced the City's Cyber Command's Deputy Chief Information Security Officer explaining that disclosing "all New York City employees' email addresses would relinquish control of the City's information technology assets and jeopardize the security of those assets and of City infrastructure" by "mak[ing] it substantially easier for threat actors to successfully attack City . . . employees" in… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Securities and Exchange Commission, 17-130, and Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am by Jim Martin
In his majority decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
No. 18-2155 Capitol South Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
” New York courts have held that “good faith” is the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes. . . . [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Alexander J. Davie
The answer lies not in securities regulations, but in an obscure but important Supreme Court case called United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm by Stefan Passantino
By Stefan Passantino & Ben Keane   It has been almost exactly 19 months since the Supreme Court handed down its controversial decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Dayspring, cited at 2006 39 R.P.R.(4th) 224 [which clearly confirmed that a loan  arranged by the declarant for assumption by the condominium corporation (and the corresponding loan security documents) will be enforceable against the condominium corporation by the lender, provided that the loan is for legitimate purposes falling within the objects and duties of the condominium corporation, and provided that all requisite steps to authorize the loan… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Carrie Cordero called for greater attention to the national security implications of corporate data collection and aggregation. [read post]