Search for: "INFORRM" Results 501 - 520 of 889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2013, 7:01 am by Graham Smith
  (Hat-tip to INFORRM and Ashley Hurst, who have documented both phases of the consultation.) [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 6:31 am by INFORRM
   It is now clear that there is no jurisdiction to make an NPO in such cases (see my Inforrm case comment on Davidoff). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The purpose of this update is to correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, to explain and comment on published Judgments of family cases and to highlight other transparency news. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland On Inforrm Olivia O’Kane had a Round Up of Northern Ireland Decisions in 2017 in libel privacy and media law. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:39 am by INFORRM
I am obliged therefore to do so by means of further Inforrm articles of which this is the first. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
After forty days of module one, the Leveson Inquiry is taking a short break before the second module into the relationship between the press and the police begins on February 27. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  There was a comment on these changes from Iain Wilson on Inforrm and a piece in the Sunday Times. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:08 am by INFORRM
The key points in Sir Brian’s letter are set out in a news update on Inforrm’s blog, as follows: That, since Part 1 of the Inquiry, it had been revealed that phone hacking was more widespread than was then disclosed [and] that the evidence given to Part 1 was “far from complete”, so that it “remains unclear exactly how widespread these and similar practices have been throughout the print media”. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
There was a piece in the Guardian and a post on Inforrm. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
In our Inforrm case comment, we described this as a “landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages“. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  We also had an Inforrm case comment on the decision. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has coverage as does INFORRM. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  There was an Inforrm post dealing with the media coverage and an Inforrm case comment. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]