Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN"
Results 501 - 520
of 9,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin, Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).Martin Loughlin Since one purpose in publishing Against Constitutionalism (AC) with Harvard was to maximise the chance of it being read by American constitutional scholars, I cannot be other than delighted with the reviews. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
’” “Generic” phrases referring to what Congress may regulate as a constitutional matter, Alito wrote, do not rebut the presumption against extraterritoriality.. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am
No, responded Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Brown). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 543 (1976), concern racial profiling in law enforcement of brown people along the U.S. southern border. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
He explained that Colorado cannot “force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
"Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance," Gorsuch added.Gorsuch's majority opinion was joined by the court's Republican-appointed justices, while liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
On Thursday, June 29, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
None of this matters much if you think universities should be given broad discretion to use racial preferences, so long as it is for seemingly good motives. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
As a practical matter, Justice Thomas is. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
One is “quid pro quo” corruption, such as the proverbial brown paper bag filled with cash handed over to the politician to have them vote a certain way. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed; she would instead have dismissed the case as improvidently granted. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am
In their dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sotomayor rejected the majority’s approach and said the court should have struck down the law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Appeals Bd. ( Brown ) (2019) 84 Cal. [read post]
