Search for: "Marbury v. Madison"
Results 501 - 520
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
Madison, Bandman concluded. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
The Board complied with the court's directive and the Plaintiff appealed the court's ruling to the Appellate Division.Citing Marbury v Madison , 1 Cranch [5 US] 137, the Appellate Division explained that a legislative body may not usurp a court's power to interpret and apply the law to the particular circumstances before it and it is beyond the authority of the County Legislature to determine that the Board's decision to withhold the… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
Should the court go all the way back to Marbury v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
In the discussion of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
(SCOTUS did the same power move in Miranda and Strickland and hell, even Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
"Marbury v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 11:55 pm
His interests, however, lay beyond Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:45 am
Although CJ John Marshall also invoked the oath as part of his argument for judicial review in Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:53 pm
Indeed, if Justice Roberts' year-end address is any indication, the Nine are currently far more concerned with old Marbury v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am
Since Marbury v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am
While the basic notion of judicial review, established by no less a dubious character than John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
The DOJ lawyer, Dana Lydia Kaersvang, answered yes — and mentioned Marbury v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:16 pm
(cf, Marbury v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:21 am
Here is the abstract: Two centuries after Marbury v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:34 pm
In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall, in the case Marbury v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:52 am
He then moved on to consider the process by which the Supreme Court might come to be regarded as the UK’s ‘constitutional court’, noting: “An explicit constitutional amendment would not be required to convert the Supreme Court into the UK’s constitutional court; the decision of Marbury v Madison was the watershed moment in the USA, and a similar decision might be made in the UK in due course. [read post]
