Search for: "Motorola, Inc. "
Results 501 - 520
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Motorola, Inc., 631 F.3d 1257, 1264 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
The Facts and the Theory In the suit, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC ("petitioners"), alleged that Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Apple, Inc., et. al. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Motorola, Inc.: This case involves a motion to dismiss a negligent misrepresentation claim on the ground that it was barred by the economic loss doctrine, and claims for tortious interference with contract and unfair and deceptive practices claims. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
Sybase 365, Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
” Indeed, “adult sex sites are perfectly legal and constitute bona fide offerings of goods or services,” Motorola, Inc. vs NewGate Internet, Inc., D2000-0079 (WIPO April 20, 2000). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
(Orthofix Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
The vendors named in the case were Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
Motorola, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
The vendors named in the case were Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The underlying dispute in the Stoneridge case arises over claims that Scientific Atlanta, Inc., and Motorola, Inc., engaged in efforts to help a giant cable television firm, Charter Communications, inflate its financial statements artificially in order to bolster its stock's price. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:02 pm
CC Media Holdings, Inc's.revenues for 2011 were $6.16 billion. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Effect of a stipulated dismissal: Garber v Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade (Patently-O) BPAI speaks on ‘transformation’ prong: Ex Parte Hardwick (12:01 Tuesday) ITC issues final determination of s 337 violation in investigation based on complaint lodged by Samsung against Sharp concerning LCD devices (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination that… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Gemalto sued HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Exedea, Inc., Google, Inc., Motorola Mobility, LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of various claims of the three patents. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Motorola, Inc., 1998 WL 299925, No. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:05 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
© 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
Global Global – General Google’s purchase of Motorola may signal trend in the Smartphone market (IP Osgoode) Global – Copyright Piracy and unauthorised copying: How much does it matter where you live? [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
