Search for: "People v Warren" Results 501 - 520 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 12:33 am
Board of Education) through 1973 (when it ruled on Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:50 pm
It does not include the Great Society (including New Property ideas of welfare entitlements), the Warren Court's criminal procedure revolution (including decisions like Miranda and Mapp v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
 This fixation on the Warren and Burger Courts is a symptom of a larger dis-ease: Whether you are a judge or an advocate, a bureaucrat or a legislative counsel, the place to begin your study of the modern Constitution is with the great decisions of a long line of Justices from Holmes to Scalia. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:39 pm by Andrew Hamm
Brandeis would not live to see a majority of the court adopt his views, as the Warren Court did when it overruled Olmstead in Katz v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
There are too many possible stories about how you are the people, and the other people are usurpers or mobs. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:54 am
It omits almost all of the so-called “liberal judicial activism” that people associate with the Warren Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Katie Gu
In tracing the historical development of the right to privacy, from Brandeis & Warren’s The Right to Privacy, to Skinner v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Next up,Warren Heit (White & Case), one of Google’s outside counsel, emphasized the value of “innovators” as well as “implementers. [read post]