Search for: "People v. Evans" Results 501 - 520 of 1,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:57 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 634-635 (1996) quoting Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The case concerns a conviction for denying the crime of genocide against the Armenian people. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
ASA published its Annual Report 2020 which highlights steps taken to make sure young and vulnerable people are protected from misleading, harmful or irresponsible ads. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Defenses commonly arising in copyright litigation—License (2d ed.).Anand Vihar LLC v Evans Group Inc., 8:16-CV-841-T-27TBM, 2016 WL 9526560, at *2 [MD Fla July 6, 2016]Substantial Similarity of Literary WorksExpert testimony is far less critical in a case like this than it is in a case where specialized knowledge is required to dissect the objective components of the copyrighted work. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm by Tom Kosakowski
In this session, an ombuds who identifies as neurodivergent will share her experiences ombudsing with a neurotypical brain and ombudsing for people who are neurodivergent. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he sat down with Tatyana Bolton, Jamil Jaffer, and Megan Stifel to discuss the first Cyber Safety Review Board Report and other recent cybersecurity law developments: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Evelyn Douek and Jurecic sat down with Evan Greer to discuss the role of Section 230 protections on liability for speech about abortion post-Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:48 am by SHG
Josh Blackman, who has been on the Supreme Court’s abortion protest buffer zone speech restriction case, McCullen v. [read post]