Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 501 - 520
of 16,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
The right to counsel may not just be a right that people watch on television shows, but one that all people, rich or poor, are granted. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
In Cole v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
His motion should be GRANTED. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:02 pm
Not surprisingly, some people blog about it. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:48 am
Most often, people think of injunctions or restraining orders as being granted when a paramour physically attacks his love interest. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898,… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
The third granted case, Renico v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
During 2010, the California Supreme Court granted review in the Court of Appeal cases of Howell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
Case citation: hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The grant of the petition notes that the case presents the following issues: (1) What procedural protections are required by Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Douglas explained: Thereligious views espoused by respondents might seem incredible, if not preposterous, to most people. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
(I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
In People ex rel. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
On December 8, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in People v Richmond, Supreme Court No. 146648. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:06 am
The Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” and in Terry v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:32 am
" The first sentence of the 5th Circuit's opinion in Rollins v. [read post]
