Search for: "People v. Harris" Results 501 - 520 of 2,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"Yet, in an indirect way, the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in People v Battles (_NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 09160 [12/14/10]), in which that Court once again rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of New York's persistent Felony Offender sentencing laws, suggests that Portalatin is not necessarily the last word on this issue. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Harkrider, Craig Harlow, Buzz Harris, Leslie Harris, Matt Harris, Tommy Harris, Steven Harrison, Joy Hart, Ken Hart, Paul Hart, Jim Hartl, Loraine Harvey, Brad Haymond, Tracey Healy, Erik J. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Ten years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Brown v Board of Education ruled that schools must be racially integrated, the city had done little to advance integration in the schools. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
The motion court found that the defendant's conduct was dangerous and ill-conceived, but it did not rise to the level of depraved indifference as defined by People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:32 pm by Eric
* the contract is illusory because eBay may modify it (see, e.g., the uncited Harris v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
” This concept may seem sufficiently broad to allow most plaintiffs’ lawyers recovery of fees, but it certainly does not have that valence after the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Home Care v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
  This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 5:47 pm
Patrick Leahy and Harry Reid voted for it. [read post]