Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In Carter v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:36 am
Just like the people that want to cut and run in Iraq. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
***Returning to trademark law itself, recall the confrontation over trademarks between "real train" people and "model train" people, leading to a dropping of demands for trademark royalties by the "real train" people: Union Pacific's move in dropping the royalties for model trains is the right one, said Becker. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:40 pm
As we argue in First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
Another practical impact of the decision may be the erosion of the state-based exchange model. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
It does not show that there were gender gaps at the stores among comparable people. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:43 pm
It will also give important support to plaintiffs in climate change litigation, such as Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:31 am
By Eric Goldman Williams v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In particular, that the claimant had raped a fellow model, Cooper Tennent (industry name “Tannor Reed”). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 10:02 pm
If the room is large enough, ventilation is ensured, and people have to wear N95 masks, a hearing like VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
The Canadian court also looked to the US and again at their position on copyright trolls, and concluded "the decisions reviewed suggest that the courts in both the UK and U.S. are particularly concerned with sanctioning a business model which coerces innocent innocent people into settlements" and that courts in both jurisdictions are open to imposing safeguards - and that the person identified by an ISP may not be the alleged infringer in all events - summarising (at page 53) a non… [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:54 pm
Zaunbrecher (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) and granted in Patchak v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
In Folkens v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:01 am
The Supreme Court in its recent NIFLA v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
Part 21FREE WITH REGISTRATIONBusiness Law Judge Awards Damages and Costs to Consumer; Modeling Agency Did Not Deliver Services People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Taha v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:37 pm
The People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
A lawyer who commences a sexual relationship necessarily creates “a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected” [emphasis added] (FLS Model Code, Rule 3.4-1, Comm’y 2 – also R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 et al). [read post]
