Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
PHILLIPS, M.D. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In 2010, in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984), fn. 6; United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
First of all, the prosecutor's arguments on the motive issue were a fair response to defense counsel's extensive arguments that DM testified falsely due to his motivations as held in Layton v Phillips. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:34 am
Phillip V. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Serving as Chief Justice of the United States was Duke Law School Dean, and former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
” More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
” More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 10:12 am
The order granting the petition for writ of certiorari is amended as follows: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Is interest earned on client trust funds held by lawyers in IOLTA accounts a property interest of the client or lawyer, cognizable under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, despite the fundamental precept of IOLTA that such funds, absent the IOLTA program, could earn interest for the client of lawyer… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
This week at the CCAs: AFCCA will hear oral argument at 1000 tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
Phillips’s victory would mean much for long. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
The appraisers valued the residential units at $70,000 and $75,000 per unit respectively. [read post]
