Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 501 - 520
of 62,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 2:05 am
Regina v N(A); Regina v Le [2012] EWCA Crim 189; [2012] WLR (D) 38 “The implementation of the United Kingdom’s obligation to comply with article 26 of the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings 2005 would normally be achieved by the proper exercise of the long established prosecutorial discretion which enabled the Crown Prosecution Service, however strong the evidence might be, to decide that it would be… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am
Damonta D. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:48 pm
Footnotes [1] See Hamby v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:40 am
Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd and another [2008] UKHL 55; [2008] WLR (D) 293 “A claimant who had entered into an oral agreement with the defendants in respect of the redevelopment of a property had no claim against them in proprietary estoppel or constructive trust based on their unconscionable withdrawal from the agreement, but was entitled to a quantum meruit in respect of money and services which he had provided. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:51 am
Regina (Save Britain’s Heritage) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2011] EWCA Civ 334; [2011] WLR (D) 107 “Demolition works were capable of constituting a project for the purposes of article 1(2) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
(U.S.S.C., June 12, 2017, Henson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
Supp. 2d 308, 313-14 (D. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
The D. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Par Philippe Signore La décision récente Therasense v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:01 am
Last week, Judge Robinson denied a Rule 56(d) motion by Acceleron in Acceleron, LLC. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 11:13 am
“[D]efendant demonstrated that records from [plaintiff’s] Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram accounts were ‘reasonably likely to yield relevant evidence. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:20 am
PR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SS (Bangladesh) v Same; TC (Zimbabwe) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 988; [2011] WLR (D) 276 “The two tiers of the tribunal system operating in respect of immigration and asylum cases were, and were plainly to be regarded as, competent to determine whether there was a compelling reason why the particular issue on which an applicant’s claim which had failed twice before that system should be… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 10:12 am
Article: Shakira D. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:45 am
Winterflood Securities Ltd and others v Financial Services Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 423; [2010] WLR (D) 101 “The definition of market abuse in s 118 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 did not require the person engaging in the behaviour in question to have intended to abuse the market and accordingly it was not essential for such an intention or purposes to be present for behaviour to fall below the objective standards expected. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:02 am
Hertfordshire County Council v Veolia Water Central Ltd [2010] EWHC 278 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 46 “The effect of regs 3 and 4 of the Street Works (Maintenance) Regulations 1992, when read with s 81 of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991, was that an highway and street authority could not make a valid charge against a statutory undertaker for emergency works which the authority had carried out to secure apparatus for which the undertaker was responsible unless the… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
"It is clear that Attorney Kramer's professional misconduct requires the severest level of discipline that we impose, namely, the revocation of his license to practice law in Wisconsin. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
Attorney Kessler's [...] [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:49 am
The Haro v. [read post]
