Search for: "STATE v. CLEMENTS"
Results 501 - 520
of 718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 7:02 pm
Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority in Bond v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Yoder, but merely returns the law to the state as it existed prior to Smith. . . . [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Clement is representing 26 state attorneys general in their challenge to the law, and Carvin represents the National Federation of Independent Business and four private individuals. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
Burlison, 262 So.2d 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); Clements v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
That will reunite former Solicitor General Paul Clement (Axon’s lawyer) with his former #2 Greg Garre (Cochran’s lawyer), who succeeded him in that post. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: City of San Clemente v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
– ‘perpetual’ licenses: BMS Computer Solutions Ltd v AB Agri Ltd (IPKat) EWHC: Exclusive jurisdiction clauses and anti-suit injunctions: Skype Technologies SA v Joltid Ltd & others (JIPLP) EWHC finds Newzbin liable for copyright infringement: Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin Ltd (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (Managing Intellectual Property) Fifth OiNK uploader walks free (TorrentFreak) Warner Bros recruits students to spy… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:02 am
The surreptitiously leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
In any event, the court relisted Peruta for the first time, which is good news for petitioners’ counsel, who include former solicitor general Paul Clement. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
“The cover page of the Vinchesi email stated `Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
The EAT took the view that both were parties to a contract and thus mutually obliged to perform their obligations, with Lady Smith (at para 87) saying; “If a party to such a contract is in material breach of one of his obligations he cannot insist that the other party perform a reciprocal term” This isn’t new law – the same principle was set out in the 2008 case of RDF v Clements all the way back to Thorneloe v McDonald & Co in… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
