Search for: "State Road Department v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The doctrine can be traced to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The new year took an early turn for the worse with our reigning relist heavyweight, Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
” Placing so much responsibility in the hands of “a couple hundred unaccountable staffers,” moreover, contributes to the concern that there is a “conspiratorial deep state [that] threatens the nation’s representative democracy. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
United States, is far more conventional. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:57 am
United States, two cases that will determine whether Guantánamo detainees have the right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Atwater took her case all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The concept of adverse possession was subsequently adopted in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Taxes played an important role in many of these relocations, but clearly many of the departing companies were looking for something other than the lowest possible tax burden. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
In Chackness v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Here, no valid penological purpose existed as to the alleged acts of the Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:45 am
The full text of the letter: Dear Attorney General Holder, We, the undersigned organizations, write to express our concern about your recent call to restrict the constitutional rights of individuals in the United States suspected of terrorist activity by seeking to codify or expand the “public safety exception” to Miranda v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:30 am
” He then cited the court’s 1975 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
James Pohl’s April 25 ruling denying defendant Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s defense motion to dismiss in United States v. al-Hawsawi; the legal weight of reports that “major combat operations” have concluded in Iraq; and the contours of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s report on the future of detainee policy, among others. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all Service members, including transgender Service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness, disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden on the military that is not conducive to military effectiveness and lethality.2. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
