Search for: "Temple v. Temple" Results 501 - 520 of 1,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm by David Markus
As you stand at the bottom of the steps looking up at the main entrance, you get a very real sense that you are standing before the “temple of justice” that the architect envisioned. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Michigan Pamela Brandwein (Michigan Political Science) -presents “United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Fiscalito
Si hay algo digno de admirar de los chinos es el temple y dedicación que ponen a las cosas, pero para muestra un boton.La empresa constructora china Broad Group, haciendo gala de poderío arquitectónico, especialistas en estructuras medioambientalmente sostenibles construyó un hotel-rascacielos de 30 plantas en 360 horas, batiendo su propio récord del año pasado, cuando construyeron otro de 15 plantas en una semana.El video muestra con mayor detalle… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:36 am
A slightly more academic post than usual:  I'm teaching Law & Religion before a wonderful group of students this semester at Notre Dame, and have just gotten through teaching the so-called "Mormon" cases -- Reynolds, Davis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Gutman Social Media Ownership Disputes, Part I: the Satanic Temple of Washington Can’t Get Its Facebook Pages Back Departing Employees Rename Their Former Employers’ Facebook Account. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
In a mundane lens, this is a somewhat unsurprising application of the notoriously conservative Article 42.5 test refined in the “PKU” case, North Western Health Board v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
Doody, No. 09-1443, the case of the horrible massacre at a Buddhist temple in Arizona, is sent back to the Ninth Circuit to reconsider in light of Florida v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]