Search for: "Texas v. White" Results 501 - 520 of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
Schedule V Substances: Schedule V drugs are considered potentially dangerous drugs with a low potential for abuse and which contain limited quantities of narcotics. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 10:42 pm by fernandomejia
Say you’re in a Criminal Law class and getting cold called on People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:55 am
Anyone remember that old SNL skit that mocked three Texas politicians' over-eagerness for the death penalty - Ann Richards, Jim Mattox and Mark White. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is language from the Texas Supreme Court case, Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 117236 (SD TX, Aug. 19, 2013), a Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2013 U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:27 am
As a result, many schools remained segregated, despite the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
Texas what diversity brought to physics. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by Melissa Hart
White Center for the Study of Constitutional Law at Colorado Law, University of Colorado Boulder. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm by Michael Lowe
Example: Jewelry Fraud Claim A recent example of a conviction for violation of Texas Penal Code 35.02 in a property insurance claim can be found in the Fort Worth case of Florez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:17 am
A ruling of racist jury selection tactics by Dallas County prosecutors moved a white inmate a giant step closer to a new trial after almost 30 years on Texas death row. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:02 pm
"As state executioners get back to work in light of last week's Supreme Court decision in Baze v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Texas in 2003) and the right of same-sex couples to marry (recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Surely an action that merely takes away a privilege disproportionately enjoyed by whites does not count as a negative disparate impact on whites simply because they formerly disproportionately enjoyed that privilege.Intrigued yet? [read post]