Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes"
Results 501 - 520
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
But, despite Senator Hughes’s stated inspiration, the laws fundamentally differ. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
Whilst the number of people marrying in England and Wales at 16 or 17 is small and continues to decline – only 134 out of nearly 235,000 marriages in 2018 – the purpose of the Act is to address the practice of child marriage through raising the minimum age of marriage and civil partnership to 18. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
But, despite Senator Hughes’s stated inspiration, the laws fundamentally differ. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Every week, though, approximately ten people die and one-thousand are sent to the emergency department by acetaminophen overdosing. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided the case of Missouri v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 3:15 am
Understanding YouTube’s Article 13 Freakout https://t.co/mi249RBjZC 2018-10-24 Facebook, Google sued for 'secretly' slurping people's whereabouts – while Feds lap it up https://t.co/2oXZENUxQY 2018-10-24 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-10-24 https://t.co/mpN0dkUURw 2018-10-25 Test for protective orders for confidential information Arkipelago Architecture Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Those who oppose abortion are, after all, very upset that after the decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Overall, Hugh Hansen (left) and Fordham have produced another fine Conference facilitating an opportunity for the meeting of IP minds from across the profession. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
Potentially, I think if people choose to live public lives and choose to be public figures then certain responsibilities have to go with it. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
This issue came up in the case, American Home Assurance Company v. [read post]
