Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 501 - 520 of 1,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:20 pm by Florian Mueller
In October, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc by the United States Federal Trade Commission in its Qualcomm case. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:39 am
This development should be monitored by all foreign manufacturers selling into the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court – again divided six to three – held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial does not have a right to a hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the money to hire a lawyer to defend him against the charges. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd., 1997 CanLII 332, the Court stated that one additional factor is whether the dismissed employee had been induced to leave previous secure employment. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Alex Gasser
Rogers, Jr. issued an initial determination (“ID”) on October 14, 2009 in which he found no violation of Section 337 because the four asserted patents were either invalid or not infringed, and because no industries existed in the United States for any of the patents asserted at the hearing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Judge Rogers concurred, reasoning that while a habeas judge has the power to order the release of a Guantanamo prisoner into the United States, that power should not have been exercised in Kiyemba in light of the offer of repatriation elsewhere. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm by Andrew Raff
" The complaint: Scorpio Music v Willis [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The cover art and subtitle suggest that the narrative is centered on United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]