Search for: "Ware v. Ware"
Results 501 - 520
of 586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 8:39 am
The recent decision in Lion’s Gate Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
Mede blijkens de in de conclusie van de Procureur-Generaal in 3.5 en 3.6 genoemde geschiedenis van art. 21 WvK gaat het hierbij erom te voorkomen, enerzijds dat een commanditaire vennoot ten name van de vennootschap aan het handelsverkeer deelneemt als ware hij beherend vennoot en aldus misbruik maakt van het rechtsgevolg dat is verbonden aan de hoedanigheid van commanditaire vennoot, en anderzijds dat derden door het optreden van een commanditaire vennoot in de veronderstelling kunnen… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:42 pm
It is much easier to complacently offer the same product or service for a highly-profitable price than to constantly refine your wares and cut prices to attract and keep customers. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
The case has been pending for several years before Second Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin under Authors Guild v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The courts must be partners with their users, including those without representation, to help them solve the puzzle of legal processes, to enable them to meaningfully participate (to paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pintea v Johns). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
In the case of The Fireworks Restoration Company v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
Also see Ware v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
Sentient Jet LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
South AfricaKoko v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Viacom v YouTube: Two weeks ago, as expected (so expected, the AmeriKat adds, that she didn't even think it was news), Viacom filed their appeal in the Viacom v YouTube case in the appeals court in New York (see previous AmeriKat posts on the case here). [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeals of British Columbia, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:01 pm
E tem outra: a mente humana ganhou os softwares que tem hoje nos últimos 200 000 anos, quando nossa espécie, o Homo sapiens, veio ao mundo. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:01 pm
E tem outra: a mente humana ganhou os softwares que tem hoje nos últimos 200 000 anos, quando nossa espécie, o Homo sapiens, veio ao mundo. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Jem Aldridge v The Hunts Post (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Carl Waring v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A woman v The Argus (Brighton) 03/05/2012; Mr Mark Gunter v Guernsey Press & Star (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Leonard Kernott v Daily Mail (Clause 3), 03/05/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph (Clause 1), 01/05/2012; A woman v East Riding Mail (Clauses 3, 9), 30/04/2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
