Search for: "Wright v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:41 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Skelly Wright and California Justice Mathew Tobriner analyzed the issue carefully in cases like Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
   Delta towns like Money and Morgan City were (and remain) part of the most impoverished region in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
United States, 440 U.S. 48 (197) that state law determines rights and obligations when the Bankruptcy Code does not supply a federal rule. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
It has decided every case it heard in November except for United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:28 am by James R. Marsh
Recently this issue has come to a head in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, In re Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238, and United States v. [read post]