Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 5181 - 5200 of 140,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Via The Billable Hour I bring you the following comic/greeting card: [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
I remember a story told by a a business owner who had been involved in the negotiation of a very complicated contract, with both sides represented by high-priced lawyers. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:24 am
Last week the ILB had an entry including this quote from a Louisville Courier Journal story:Jeffersonville's Board of Ethics made plans last night to investigate whether the campaign of Mayor Rob Waiz violated the city's ethics ordinance when it bought several Internet addresses likely to be used by the campaign of former Mayor Tom Galligan.Today the Indianapolis Star Sports Section has an AP story (not available from the Star site, but also carried at this Minnesota link) that reports:DES… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm by Shannon Achimalbe
How seriously do employers consider experienced attorneys for entry-level legal positions? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:52 am by Mark Roth
Practitioners and judges frequently use the terms subrogation and contribution interchangeably. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:20 am
A short piece in law student mag The National Jurist has me thinking about the importance and impact of the size of a law school. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by Steve Lombardi
When representing someone in a motor vehicle accident we tend to focus on the initial vehicle crash itself. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 8:06 am
Let's say you own a radio station in Florida, and let's call it WTKE, for example. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:50 am
A few years ago, Ambimb recommended shortening the JD to a 2 year curriculum. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It is important to understand that objections to income and wealth inequality, such as those I’ve shared in Getting to the Root of the Problem, Absurdity Breeds More Absurdity, Income and Wealth Inequality: A Threat, Not a Distraction, Working Hard? [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The following is a more detailed analysis by my partner, Richard (Rick) Josepher: WHAT DOES ZWERNER CASE MEAN TO PRACTITIONERS AND TO TAXPAYERS CONSIDERING MAKING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES OF OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS WHERE PENALTIES ARE NOT DETERMINED UNDER FORMAL OFFSHORE DISCLOSURE PROGRAMS? [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:15 am by Brian Guralnick
” When it comes to personal injury cases, some cases can be settled in a matter of months. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by CJLF Staff
  It does not matter to the Black Lives Matter movement that 93% of the 7,881 black murder victims last year were killed by black criminals. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
  Stephan says that Lewin and I, and those who agree with us, “get current law wrong” and “blow by potential legal obstacles at warp speed,” but he does not discuss the words of the statutory text on which we rely. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
First off, in anticipation of President Obama’s decision this week to take on the immigration issue, Ben examined the central question in the standoff between him and Congress: how much discretion does he have to decline, as a matter of policy, the deportation of millions of people? [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Legal debates over the constitutionality of the individtal mandate generally focus on three different questions: (1) As a matter of constitutional theory, how should a court rule based on a normative theory of interpretation; (2) As a matter of existing doctrine, how does the mandate fit (or not fit) into existing law, and (3) As a prediction, if the case reaches the Supreme Court, how might the Justices rule? [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:30 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
This does not apply, however, when the employee is speaking in their official capacity as a government employee. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:30 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
This does not apply, however, when the employee is speaking in their official capacity as a government employee. [read post]