Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 5181 - 5200 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am by M Bates
My right to life liberty and security of the person may not provide a "right to bear arms" as for our neighbours to the south, but a protective vest presents no risk of harm to anyone, and using my desire to protect myself from harm as a way to purportedly subject me to what would clearly otherwise be an unlawful detention and search simply crosses the line.Wake up Alberta.Oh, and in case you still think I am just being some kind of alarmist, for fun, have a read of the judgment… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:50 am by INFORRM
IPSO, the major publisher’s own regulator set up in defiance of the judge’s recommendation and the cross-party agreement does little to inspire confidence in complainants. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case was South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The saga of Case C 208/09  Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, in which the court gave its ruling on 22 December, all began in Vienna, Austria, in 1944 where Ilonka was born, instantly becoming an Austrian citizen. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:11 am by Josh Camson
So if you wanted to send a link to Crawford v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Cross-disciplinary and comparative papers are particularly welcomed. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
  One should not expect people to accept arguments just because they are valid. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 8:54 am by Mario Zúñiga
District Court for the Northern District of California in its ruling in the Epic v. [read post]