Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 25,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2010, 2:19 pm
In large part precisely because of the expansive interpretations of CEQA that have been established by precedent in cases the majority of which Justice Mosk would agree with.I have no doubt that anti-environmentalists, including but not limited to developers frustrated with past environmental litigation, are laughing heartily at this afternoon's decision.This is perhaps the legal doctrinal equivalent to the non-legal line: "Karma's a bi[a]tch. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
The question for the ET was whether it is reasonably necessary in order to achieve the legitimate aims of the scheme to deny those benefits to people in the applicant’s position. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:56 am
The Fit, along with the two recently recalled vehicles, were part of a 962,000-vehicle recall worldwide. [read post]
Constitutional to Ban Corporate Contributions to Candidates (as Opposed to Independent Expenditures)
16 May 2011, 9:20 am
Few people would do that, but some people who want to be big political players might. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:31 am
Thus, I don't care if a nominee is a liberal or a conservative, or whether he or she supports Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:54 am
Under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, certain employers (that employ more than 50 people) must allow people time off to care for "serious medical conditions. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Harding's pardon of Eugene V. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
Betnar, 214 Or.App. 416, 166 P.3d 554 (Oregon Court of Appeals 2007), and People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:50 pm
Shuger v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:20 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 10:10 am
Case citation: Jacobus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
Although the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Supreme Court's decision last week in Autozone v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:40 am
In Ladele v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 10:23 am
The decision came from the case Antonio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:16 pm
In light of the conflict between our holding and the First Department's holding in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
