Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5201 - 5220 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by Ortiz Law Firm
Sutton then filed this case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:32 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Appellate Court’s Decision The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the suit. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Daley's testimony about generally accepted standards of psychological practice and procedures, Judge Levine held: Although there have been few decisions elucidating defendant's exact burden of proof to establish that the services were medically unnecessary, Nir. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am by Eugene Kontorovich
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Before I quickly run through my constitutional views – which don’t differ much from Judge Carlos Bea’s partial dissent in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To avoid defending an action, the insurer bears the burden of showing that the claim is not even potentially covered (see United States Fid. [read post]