Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5201 - 5220 of 9,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Florian Mueller
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
In 2005, while in the United States, Anthimos met and married Respondent Aalison, a United States citizen. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
The defendant bears the burden of proving a private party acted as a state agent. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina–Lara from custody immediately. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Respondent Admitted that he wasn’t using the mark MYUNDIES with the clothing items specified in his application on the date he filed it with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
After a jury convicted Christopher Castillo “of making a threat to injure or kill the President of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Because I am based in the United States and because my experience has been concentrated in the U.S., my focus in this blog has primarily been on issues and developments in the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
The court stated that the third factor, weighed in favor of finding a partial taking because the burden of the regulation fell disproportionately on Ocean Palm Golf. [read post]