Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Moreover, “in order that the subject-matter of a claim relating to a diagnostic method practised on the human or animal body falls under the prohibition of A 52(4) EPC [1973], the claim is to include (in view of A 84 EPC [1973]) the feature pertaining to the diagnosis for curative purposes as a purely intellectual exercise representing the deductive medical or veterinary decision phase …, as well as the features relating to … the preceding steps which are constitutive for… [read post]
30 May 2011, 1:00 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:15 am
What does this opinion do? [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:33 am
We usually do not know we need to change a legal rule to prevent X until X occurs and we see the full consequences of X. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:49 pm
I mean, really, why would you do such a thing? [read post]
28 May 2011, 11:01 am
[…]If I understand things correctly, this obiter dictum from T 241/99 does not contradict T 472/92. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:00 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:52 am
Does the statutory cap on noneconomic damages, Fla. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm
If decisions in §1983 actions followed the usual course, the court would decide that it is not clearly established that Action X violates a constitutional right and not reach the question of whether Action X actually does violate a constitutional right. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:00 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:52 am
They were a bit confused about the status of bloggers, I think. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:42 am
I have a nasty feeling that probably you are going to end up having to pay for this but what does everyone else think? [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:28 am
The list of proposed factors is illustrative and the SEC does not intend it to be exhaustive or mutually exclusive. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:59 am
If a car traveling fast behind us, does not see brake lights when we downshift to slow down, they do not know we are slowing down, and they rear end us. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:38 pm
As I said before, insurance is a financial safety net. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:00 pm
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:23 pm
This is not the fault of any NB premier, but I believe its negligent to follow the course of going to Ottawa hat in hand. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:10 am
(The court does not address the copyright preemption argument but I think there's one lurking in the background, since the conduct CollegeSource is complaining of is the copying its materials by AcademyOne.) [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:00 am
The defendant does nothing with the offer and the case proceeds. [read post]
