Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5221 - 5240 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To avoid defending an action, the insurer bears the burden of showing that the claim is not even potentially covered (see United States Fid. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The exercise of this authority is fully consistent with the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Connecticut. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Gary Corn
  Make no mistake about it: The Chinese government is in the business of collecting data at scale, and the United States is its prime target. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 11:55 am
Since the Iowa Department of Corrections has now terminated its contract with InnerChange, the program has ceased operation in Iowa, and InnerChange has paid back to the state all funds that the court had ordered it to return, in April the defendants in the case asked the federal district court to dissolve the injunction that had been issued.In Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
The parties agreed that, more than a year before filing its patent application, i4i had sold a software program known as S4 in the United States, but they disagreed over whether that software embodied the invention claimed in i4i's patent. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
In 2005, after changing its focus, iGov won a 5-year $300 million contract with the United States Special Operations Command (the “TACLAN” contract). [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  We’re not aware of this yet being done yet in the United States - by all means tell us if we're wrong - but a litigation hold order precluding plaintiff from deleting social media information was recently issued in Canada. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
They are also aghast at how gender inscribes burdens and opportunities in the United States, even as they envisage distinctive gender identities and roles for themselves. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
  The Bertinos argued that the ordinance violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
  The Bertinos argued that the ordinance violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:59 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The parties (United States Attorney) joined in the defendant jointly agreed that the conviction should be vacated because he provided false testimony at the trial. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:59 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The parties (United States Attorney) joined in the defendant jointly agreed that the conviction should be vacated because he provided false testimony at the trial. [read post]